Introduction

“A multipolar world with bipolar characteristics” captures the central paradox of today’s international system. While global power is diffusing across multiple states, real strategic contestation is increasingly shaped by the rivalry between two dominant poles—the United States and China. The article argues that beneath the surface of multipolarity lies a deeply polarised global order, marked by strategic blocs, contested norms, and intensifying great-power competition.

Key Facts from the Article

• The post–Cold War unipolar moment of the US is weakening.

• China has emerged as the second-largest economy, nearing parity with the US in PPP terms.

• The Russia–Ukraine war exposed limits of Western dominance and sanctions-based power.

• US alliances (NATO, Quad, AUKUS) are strengthening.

• China is consolidating influence through BRI, technology dominance, and strategic partnerships.

Key Issues Highlighted

1. Illusion of Multipolar Equality
   • 1. Many states exist, but power concentration remains skewed.
2. • 2. Example: US and China dominate global military, economic, and tech domains.
3. Return of Bloc Politics
   • 1. Countries increasingly align with either US-led or China-centric systems.
4. • 2. Example: NATO expansion vs China–Russia strategic convergence.
5. Ukraine War as a Structural Turning Point
   • 1. Exposed fractures in global consensus and limits of Western coercive power.
6. • 2. Example: Global South’s reluctance to fully back Western sanctions.
7. Economic Interdependence amid Strategic Rivalry
   • 1. Competition exists alongside deep trade linkages.
8. • 2. Example: US–China trade remains substantial despite decoupling rhetoric.
9. Strategic Uncertainty for Middle Powers
   • 1. States face pressure to choose sides.
10. • 2. Example: India, ASEAN nations balancing autonomy with alignment.

Global Practices / Comparative Perspectives

Insight: Modern multipolarity lacks the stability mechanisms of Cold War bipolarity.

Indian Policy & Strategic Thinking

Way Forward

1. Strengthen middle-power coalitions to prevent rigid bipolarity.
2. Reform global institutions to reflect new power realities.
3. Promote issue-based multilateralism over bloc politics.
4. Ensure strategic autonomy through diversified partnerships.
5. Stabilise great-power rivalry via crisis-management mechanisms.
6. Empower Global South voices to avoid dominance by two poles.

Conclusion

The emerging global order is neither fully multipolar nor purely bipolar. It is a hybrid system where power diffusion coexists with intense rivalry between two dominant actors. Managing this contradiction will determine whether the world moves toward cooperative stability or prolonged strategic fragmentation.

Prelims MCQ

Q1. With reference to the contemporary global order, consider the following statements:

1. Multipolarity necessarily implies equal distribution of power among states.

2. The US–China rivalry is shaping alliance structures worldwide.

3. The Ukraine conflict has accelerated the erosion of the unipolar world order.

4. Middle powers have greater strategic autonomy in rigid bipolar systems.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

a) 2 and 3 only

b) 1 and 3 only

c) 1 and 2 only

d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: A) 2 and 3 only

UPSC Mains Practice Question

Q1. “The contemporary world order appears multipolar in structure but bipolar in behaviour.”

Critically examine the statement and discuss its implications for India’s foreign policy. (250 words)