Introduction

“The deliberate unmaking of India’s right to work” argues that the proposed rollback and restructuring of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) represents not an administrative reform, but a deeper ideological shift away from rights-based welfare. The article situates MGNREGA as a constitutional expression of social justice and warns that its dilution weakens the State’s obligation to provide livelihood security in a deeply unequal economy.

Key Issues

1. Erosion of a Legal Right
• MGNREGA transforms welfare into an enforceable entitlement.
• Example: Replacing it with discretionary schemes removes citizens’ right to demand work.
2. Shift from Demand-Driven to Supply-Driven Welfare
• Allocations replace worker demand as the basis of employment.
• Example: States lose flexibility to respond to local distress.
3. Fiscal Centralisation
• States increasingly constrained by Union funding caps.
• Example: Delayed wage payments despite completed work.
4. Ideological Retreat from Social Democracy
• Preference for market efficiency over social protection.
• Example: Emphasis on “asset creation” over livelihood security.
5. Undermining Rural Resilience
• MGNREGA acts as a shock absorber during droughts, pandemics, and job losses.
• Example: COVID-19 saw massive rural return migration cushioned by MGNREGA.

Facts from the Article

1. MGNREGA (2005) is India’s largest rights-based employment programme, guaranteeing 100 days of wage employment.
2. It is demand-driven and legally enforceable, unlike discretionary welfare schemes.
3. The proposed VB-GRAM framework replaces guaranteed employment with allocation-based schemes.
4. Budgetary compression and delayed payments have reduced real wage security.
5. Rural distress has intensified due to inflation, climate stress, and informalisation of labour.

Static linkage: Article 21 (Right to Life), Directive Principles (Articles 39, 41, 43), concept of social citizenship (T.H. Marshall)

Global Practices/Comparative Experiences

Lesson: Employment guarantees strengthen economic stability and social cohesion.

Indian Committee / Policy References

Way Forward

1. Restore full legal guarantee of employment under MGNREGA.
2. Ensure timely wage payments through automatic compensation mechanisms.
3. Index wages to inflation to preserve real income security.
4. Strengthen State autonomy in planning and execution.
5. Integrate climate-resilient works to address ecological stress.
6. Treat employment as a macro-stabiliser, not merely a welfare cost.

Conclusion

MGNREGA is not merely a poverty-alleviation scheme; it is a democratic instrument that affirms the dignity of labour and the State’s constitutional responsibility. Diluting the right to work risks replacing social citizenship with charity, and resilience with precarity. In a labour-surplus economy, employment guarantees are not fiscal indulgences but democratic necessities.

Prelims MCQ

Q1. With reference to MGNREGA, consider the following statements:

1. It is a demand-driven programme backed by legal entitlement.
2. Wage payments under MGNREGA are discretionary in nature.
3. The Act aims to enhance livelihood security in rural areas.
4. States have no role in planning works under the scheme.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

a) 1 and 3 only

b) 2 and 4 only

c) 2 and 3 only

d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: a) 1 and 3 only

UPSC Mains Practice Question

Q1. “Diluting employment guarantees undermines both economic resilience and democratic accountability.”

Critically examine the statement in the context of recent changes to India’s rural employment framework. (250 words)